It's force RH to improve their own product and it benefits for the users.Ĭompetition is vital to having a good product, right? I'am happy that Mandrake guys challenge Redhat. To Mandrake team: please please please don't repeat RedHat's mistakes. I don't like that it ships with a pre-release kernel as well as betas of other apps, as Skeezix has pointed out. However, I'm worried that Mandrake is starting to do what RedHat is doing - ship beta and pre-release packages. I can only hope that Mandrake 6.1 is just as good. Perhaps it has something to do with glibc2.1? No big deal - I just copied the vimrc file.įinally, for some reason, Netscape seems to crash a lot more often. SuSE puts a lot of key mappings in the vimrc file so that the arrows, home/end, pgup/pgdn, etc. Secondly, and that's not something specific to KDE, it doesn't have the nice key mappings for vim that SuSE has. Download an rpm of any KDE app - it'll install itself under /opt/kde. Putting KDE under /usr is counter-productive and confusing since all the KDE apps expect it to be under /opt/kde. First of all, KDE was not in the standard location. There were, of course, a few things that I didn't like about it. Oh, and the colorized gcc output is kind of neat. All the apps seem to have a significantly smaller memory footprint (I'm assuming that's the effect of the optimizations?), and that causes the system to swap much less and load apps faster. Pentium optimizations turned out to speed up the system a lot. the installation part), it turned out to be RedHat that actually works. Although it still felt like RedHat initially (esp. I immediately downloaded a copy and installed it (got to love the cable modem :).įrom what I can tell so far, it's an award well deserved. that said Mandrake had been awarded Product of the Year. I used to think of Mandrake as nothing more then RedHat with KDE slapped on top of it - and I started to hate Redhat with a passion after it killed my partition table. I run Mandrake 6.0 and I like it very much. Speaking from experience, it really sucks walking into a screen. I think it's critical that any of the doors Red Hat is given credit to for opening should really be opened. (Was the Thinkpad really doing that poorly against competing laptops that IBM felt they had to push this one for Red Hat certification? Do they really think this will affect their future sales positively?) I think this is a risk that could have easily been avoided by picking a different model to certify. But, as their IPO risks statement said, they risk losing the support of the community. I'm guessing the businessmen at Red Hat thought it would be great to further legitimize themselves by having a hardware certification program and to grant IBM a favor to promote good relations with a huge industry player. Of course, this is from the geek "big picture" and not from the business "big picture". That the only machine they've certifed was one that contained a winmodem demonstrates a profound lack of ethics, imho. I think Red Hat is really blowing it the hardware certification area, though. For instance, the new kernels and X support evermore devices. I think consumers could easily sway between Mandrake, Red Hat or Corel (once released), as they tend to be more about pushing the envelope on "new user gui friendliness", which recently has necessarily meant releasing quickly. Of course, given that Mandrake won the Linux product of the year award at LWCE, which had a 'suit-friendly' aroma, and that Caldera also won an award, I wouldn't regard Red Hat dominance in this segment as a given. I noticed a post yesterday where someone said he was choosing Red Hat to push at work despite those problems for the very reason that the PHB's have seen it mentioned in a good light in the standard PHB-oriented publications. The Linux distribution I'd give the undisputed "most tested" title to is Debian.Ĭorporations may be effectively targeted by Red Hat, though. Is a network administer interested in trying out GNU/Linux for some mission critical service going to opt for a distribution with a prerelease of the kernel and other relatively untested packages, or is he/she going to opt for the distribution that is the most widely used and supported, and fairly well-tested? The "networking professionals" around here use Debian GNU/Linux, FreeBSD and OpenBSD (And occasionally Solaris if the boss requests it) Red Hat is not even in the running due to their hasty releases & apparent lack of any real testing, quality control or attention to security issues. Are we talking about a distribution targeted at networking professionals, corporations, consumers?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |